Discipleship: An Unreasonable Request

by Nicole
Posted July 27, 2012 • 13 comments

In the latest issue of Sunstone, Dana Cattani presents “The Eleven Percent Solution,” an open letter of protest about the burden of cleaning the church. The final scene in her essay retells a conversation between the author and another ward member while they clean the church building. The sister with “a generous heart” admits she’d rather pay 11% tithing than clean the church; Cattani follows up by saying, “If I have to clean the building, I think I should be paying less, not more, and 9% is my top offer”  (17).

Cutting one’s tithes by 1% because of voluntary cleaning work comes off as tasteless at best and apostate at worst. However, I was even more disturbed by the opening story: her friend from another church helps coordinate two nights of shelter for their city’s homeless. When Cattani was asked if her church would be willing to shelter the homeless on one of those nights, she “blurted out, ‘Who would clean the bathrooms?’” (15).

Let’s back up a bit here. For one, even if Cattani is currently serving as Relief Society President or compassionate service director, she actually has no right to unilaterally decide whether or not her church building could be used as a homeless shelter. That decision would have to be made by the Stake President and, most likely, approved by the Church’s legal department. For another, I am embarrassed to think her friend’s impression of the LDS Church (through Cattani’s carelessness) is that we don’t provide service because we might have to clean up afterward.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is arguably one of the greatest humanitarian service agencies in the world. I have seen it firsthand: Elders’ Quorums helping families move; Relief Societies arranging flowers and food for funerals; eight-year-old girls in Activity Days weeding gardens for the elderly; young men and young women volunteering their evenings to babysit for single mothers while they work or go to school. Many of us have also read about or witnessed worldwide humanitarian work. I lived on the Gulf Coast when Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans. Latter-day Saints from my ward and stake took time off work, dragged trailers behind their trucks, and cleaned up all along the coast.

The hours we spend volunteering, cleaning, cooking, making quilts, moving furniture, pulling weeds, donating school supplies, and visiting the needy reflect one important principle: Discipleship.

We all agree that discipleship is part of following Christ, taking his name upon us, and being good Mormons. But why are we so quick to dismiss stories about discipleship? We tend push them toward the pulpit or Deseret Book. In Mormon literary circles rather than celebrate discipleship, we often criticize acts that would reflect our commitment to Christ.

If a story or essay centers on discipleship, it is the first to be scrutinized as “not literary.” Orson Scott Card’s short story featured in Dispensation “Christmas at Helaman’s House” was savaged by critics who called it “weak,” “pedantic,” or “homiletic.” Truthfully, the story has some structural problems, but critics aren’t focusing on the perspective shift or stalled movement of the story: they’ve dismissed it because it’s a story about consecration.

But discipleship and consecration of time, money, and talents shouldn’t only be part of who we are and what we do with our busy Mormon lives. Discipleship should be reflected in our literature. We can write essays that celebrate the time and effort we give; we can write stories that encourage us to be better disciples. Our poetry can reflect the humility of discipleship.

It is difficult to get out of the house on a day off and go clean the church. Especially if you can muster up all of the excuses Cattani gives:  busy students, pregnant women, the elderly, and parents with toddlers. But more of us are willing to do the act of service rather than tell about it. We should celebrate our culture of service and our dedication to Christ in our literature, or we risk losing a core component of our identity.

This morning my husband, eight-year-old daughter, not-quite-two-year-old son, and I walked to the church for our cleaning assignment. We met up with our friends who have two daughters under three years old. James and I cleaned the chapel. Our daughter emptied the garbage cans in all of the classrooms. Our friends washed windows and doors and vacuumed classrooms and hallways. When I crouched down to clean the floor of the bathroom, my friend said “I can’t believe you can do that!”—because I’m nearly six months pregnant. We sort of look like that group of people who Cattani feels shouldn’t have to clean the church. But after we finished cleaning, my daughter invited our friends over for lunch. The kids played in the sprinklers while we cooked together. Cleaning the church brought us together, gave us a reason to talk and play.

I think this is why we don’t pay 11% tithing for janitorial services; we have a lot to learn from each other. Let’s get those stories out there, so we can celebrate rather than criticize discipleship.

. . . and the Four Centuries of Mormon Stories contest is a good place to send those stories!

13 Responses to “Discipleship: An Unreasonable Request”

  1. Brian says:

    Well said, Nicole. When Jesus cleaned the disciples’ feet and when Jesus allowed the sinful woman to clean his own, He demonstrated the importance of service and of being served. The Book of Mormon and the New Testament are filled with stories of Jesus and His disciples serving and being served without taking thought of what other things they could be doing.

  2. Th. says:

    .

    You sound really, really angry, Nicole. I just read that essay earlier today and I have a feeling you missed the thrust of her argument. Even if I tend to come down on your side, I think you’re treating her essay a little unfairly.

    Also read James’s. Tell him I can’t wait to read the other ninety-five.

    • Nicole says:

      Th.
      I am not necessarily angry, but I was rather disturbed by what I saw as the thrust of Cattani’s argument. It seems to me that she thinks “busy” people shouldn’t be asked to do additional service, particularly “menial labor.” Of course, time is a precious commodity: but she did have time to write a 2000-word essay for Sunstone. Writing is a good endeavor. I’m not saying that it’s bad. It just seems contradictory to me.
      Of course, I may be too sensitive to complaints about service because of my own experiences. I worked in a volunteer center and helped run a Sub-for-Santa program for several years. I saw families give up their own Christmases to give presents to other families. Young parents would come searching for opportunities to serve with their toddlers. Teenagers dedicated hours of time to help people in need. During my second year of graduate school at BYU, I taught service learning first-year writing classes, and those students never complained about giving up their time to serve. Their responses were overwhelmingly positive, and they became advocates for the programs they worked with.
      I suppose that Cattani’s essay bothered me because I see things a bit differently than she does: cleaning the church may be assigned, but it is entirely voluntary; paying ten percent tithing is a commandment, but it is entirely voluntary. No one is forcing anyone else to be a good Mormon. We choose it. We make the conscious decision to strive to be like Christ. And that’s wherein the beauty of living the Gospel lies.
      I saw her essay as an argument for limiting the role of service in Mormon identity. Perhaps I did misunderstand what she was saying.
      What do you feel was her central argument?

      • myrna layton says:

        Nicole, I did not hear any anger in your tone at all…

      • Th. says:

        .

        I saw her central argument as threefold.

        First, that member service is a limited resource that should be used wisely. Whether or not cleaning the building is doing so or not remains an open question.

        Second, the more that is asked, the more that certain small percentage of member who always rise to the occasion will give. Everyone else will benefit whether they step up or not. This is, of course, a very Christian sort of thing, but see argument one.

        Third, the Church has the funds to pay for these things. This is tied into the first argument again—whether or not tithing funds are more or less sacred than members’ time.

        I didn’t feel she was really reaching conclusions, just offering discussion points. But apparently I think the first argument was her main argument.

        In related news, I really loved http://www.lds.org/ensign/2012/07/unspotted-from-the-world?lang=eng from the Ensign last month.

  3. Scott Hales says:

    I agree with your thoughts on consecration here, although I disagree with you on “Christmas at Helaman’s House,” which I think fails to make a strong enough argument for the kind of committed consecration you’re writing about. I feel that Card should have ended the story as Helaman recognizes his personal vanity and failure to live the law of consecration by building an enormous monument to himself. I feel the way Card ends it softens the critique the story makes of Mormons who let the accumulation of wealth and goods get in the way of their covenanted obligations to consecrate all they have to the Kingdom. When I read the story, I felt as if Card was trying to make the critique without offending anyone who might see himself or herself in Helaman.

    At the same time, I think you are right that the Church’s culture of service and consecration needs a more prominent place in Mormon literature. I think Todd Robert Petersen’s “Rift” does a lot to emphasize this aspect of Mormon culture in a literary way, whereas a novel like “Sideways to the Sun” is a bit more critical of simple efforts of Mormon service or consecration, dismissing them as robotic or unfeeling.

    • Nicole says:

      Scott, I actually agree with much of your assessment of “Christmas at Helaman’s House.” (The explanation of Card’s possible motivation for concluding it that way makes a lot of sense.) I used Card’s story as an example because it is the most recent non-Deseret Book publication that has been slammed for being “preachy” while the real issues in the story were completely ignored. Honestly, Card broke several of his own rules of fiction in the story, so he must realize there are problems. My point with “Christmas at Helaman’s House” is not that it’s the finest story in Dispensation but it’s been put down; my point is that critics make all kinds of allowances for stories that criticize our commitment to discipleship but dismiss stories that try to find ways to celebrate discipleship. James did say I should have had more than one example, but I suppose I felt that my Soapbox was getting too long.

  4. Moriah Jovan says:

    I don’t have Sunstone (yikes!), but I categorically agree with the 11% to pay for janitorial services.

    After everything else we are asked to do, this is just another burden on already over-burdened necks. Is there a reason we can’t find discipleship lessons with the things we’re already doing? MUST there be YET ANOTHER THING to do to prove…something?

  5. ~T~ says:

    Our primary music leader distributed some rare treats today, stating clearly that they must be consumed after church, and no wrappers must be left on the floor.

    “Yeah,” agreed an eight-year-old boy. “I just cleaned this place yesterday.”

    He’d learned, through experience, the consequences of carelessness and even of the ordinary use of the Lord’s property. It’s a lesson he’ll probably have to learn many times before it really sinks in. But as long as we all share the responsibility, we’ll all have many chances to learn from our service.

  6. myrna layton says:

    I have been thinking about your essay for the past hour or so, and a few thoughts come to mind. First of all, I was thinking that, to me, paying tithing is a privilege…over the 50+ years of my life, I have seen rich blessings that come from paying tithing, so I don’t resent paying. Quite the reverse. Honored, maybe. Secondly, when I was a child through when I was a young married women, there was tithing AND building fund to be paid. My parents set the example of faithfully paying both, and doing so with a gratitude attitude. So, to me, cleaning the church kind of takes the place of building fund, only it is a much smaller consecration. In our building, where three wards meet, I may be assigned to clean the church only twice a year. It is something that I look forward to. In my ward live many people with six figure incomes–they, alongside people like me with five figure incomes, and also people with no income (who obviously don’t pay tithing) , work together with no difference between who has money and who doesn’t. We all consecrate our time and energy for two hours and get the reward of a clean building which we appreciate more because of our united effort. I was thinking about the person who would rather pay 11% than clean the church–such a person should maybe keep their 1% and instead hire a professional cleaner for a couple of hours to do their share of church cleaning. And for the person who would rather help clean the church and pay only 9% tithing–that person I just pity, because she has not caught the vision of what paying tithing is all about. And it isn’t about the money. It is about…discipleship. The Lord asks us to pay a tithing, ten percent, and so we pay it willingly, and he pours out blessings, just as he promised. But this is not really something that can be taught; you can tell people, but you can’t “learn” them. They have to learn it for themselves.

    • Th. says:

      .

      Since I’ve already left half a dozen replies, can I ask a general question if anyone stops by here again? My impression is that most wards do a good job delegating the cleaning responsibilities and spreading them around. Yet it sounds like in Cattani’s ward, this process is crazy dysfunctional. What are other people’s experiences?